Performing Arts Kidlit Lexicon

Today, I’ve been thinking about types of characters in performing arts books.  There’s no question–the same kind of people show up in these stories, don’t they?  There’s the kid who always gets the lead (and knows it), the diamond-in-the-rough star nobody expected, the retired-artist mentor who might just coach our hero into being the practiced performer he or she dreams of being (if only the hero will WORK), and so on.

As I created this blog, I realized we may need a dictionary of sorts–a lexicon for performing arts kid stories.  It may take a while, but here are a few terms I’ve come up with so far:

The Reluctant–The character who is performing against his or her will.  Either a child who never wanted to dance/act/whatever in the first place, or a child who wanted to, but changes his or her mind before long and can’t get out of it.  In many series books, this is the main character–a “regular kid” protagonist–who eagerly enters the world of film or commercials, then quickly grows bored or miserable with it.  This child will try to find a way out of the performing world in the end.

The Natural–Your basic prodigy.  A character the author implies was born to dance/act/whatever because of some innate talent or qualities he or she possesses.  This child has either been performing the art practically since birth, or picks it up at an astonishing rate when he or she begins training.  In addition, this character may think of little else–her or she is a devoted slave to performance.  Even pleasing an audience is far less important than creating great art for art’s sake.

The Beauty–If nature was extraordinarily kind to a character, he or she may be at the top of the performing ladder partially thanks to his or her face or physique.  This type of character is often described as having unusually large, startlingly-colored eyes, the perfect shape or size body, and some other physical quality that makes him/her stand out.  Being a Beauty is a little different than being a Natural because it has more to do with attractiveness than talent.  This type of character will often be given the lead roles simply for prettiness.  May or may not be untalented or a bit of a dim bulb.

You know, Jerry, I would love to. Except how can I when she is just so late on her cues?

The Brat–This is the character you love to hate, the Nellie Oleson of the performing world.  This kid is a success, and it’s gone straight to his or her head in the worst possible way.  This character wields power, throws tantrums, and is completely two-faced, so the public never knows.  His or her parents aren’t helping matters, and usually neither is whoever is supposed to be in charge.  Jason Hervey’s child actor character in Pee Wee’s Big Adventure is my favorite movie Brat ever.

The Stage Parent–The parent of the performing child who will do anything and everything to see his or her child succeed.  Could be because the child wants it, or could be in spite of the child really not wanting it.  This person talks behind the other children’s and parents’ backs, cozies up to the director or producers, and generally makes a jerk of him or herself.  The stage parent’s desire for fame/fortune through his or her child supersedes common sense and logic at times.  He or she will do anything to get his or her little star ahead.

Naturally, quality writing goes well beyond types, creating characters who are real, developed people with flaws and good points alike.  Nevertheless, if you’ve ever hung out at a dance studio or children’s theater auditions, you know, don’t you?  These people are out there!

So, can you think of some other performing kidlit types I’ve left out?  I’d love to add some more!

Advertisements
Categories: About This Blog | Tags: , , , , , | 2 Comments

Post navigation

2 thoughts on “Performing Arts Kidlit Lexicon

  1. Happy second banana? That supporting character who will be the main character’s best friend and convince her that she DESERVES that starring role — that it wasn’t luck, it was talent, darnit!

  2. I love it! The “supportive best friend” type is definitely a standard. Usually with quirky looks and a great sense of humor, they “keep it real” (do people still say that?) for the top dog. Definitely adding that one to the list.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: